Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by cyberax | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

cyberax·

> For SpaceX's 175 kW satellites

That's like a quarter of a rack of modern AI hardware. Modern AI datacenters are now in the multi-GW range.

View on HN

Okay, so you agree the cooling problem has a solution.

Now the argument is, what, you can't launch that many satellites?

The argument is that launching and operating those satellites is more expensive than just using the same silicon on the ground.

I don't think that is the argument, or if so it's an odd one because it's just a fact right now. Instead, people are claiming that it will never be feasible from a purely physics standpoint, which is something debatable.

Saying it’s impossible isn’t debatable because it obviously is. What would stop you from a physics standpoint to just launch 100 ISS with Server racks in each? A few kW of installed power in space is already reality, it’s just really expensive.

How sure are you of that? How much does each satellite cost? How much will silicon on the ground cost in 2030?

How can anyone be certain of any of those numbers without (a) knowing how the technology will evolve, and (b) doing the math?

I'm just astounded that people can have such confidence.

We know such thing as physics and economics. That dictate the fundamental limits.

They are showing that space-based DCs only make sense for criminal enterprises. Which probably IS what's going on here.

While I really don’t trust Google, I’m not sure I call them a criminal enterprise.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com