You really don't think OpenAI restricts their most advanced bio/cyber models similarly? I know for a fact they do. Talk to one of your friends that work there.
I'm not saying they don't restrict them, I'm saying they don't try to both take the moral high ground about it and simultaneously do marketing on the basis of it.
They're not saying "this is an existential risk" while pushing hard on exactly that risk.
Of course they believe it's an existential risk. Maybe not as publicly as Anthropic but it is the dominant belief within OpenAI and they do describe this belief externally with some frequency.
Famously Anthropic exists because OpenAI didn't believe deeply enough in that risk.
I have it on good authority that OpenAI has become pretty existential-risk-pilled over the last month. But yes, it probably doesn't run as deeply in the culture versus Anthropic.
Fair point, it does seem to be changing recently. It seems less religious and more practical than at Anthropic.
It restricts them far, far less. It is much less obnoxious.