Hacker News Reader

Proud ignorance? With such many references to support his point it looks pretty informed to me.

Did you chase those references? A core premise and complaint is entirely false.

This is an article and author that is tailored for AI curmudgeons or an AI rejectionist to self-assure themselves that their worldview is the only correct one. Facts seem to be a nuisance at best here for the author, and helpful phrases like "garbage", "vile", "human toll", "psychopaths" undermine all chances or credibility for a reasonable take or conversation.

Did you feel targeted by the author's criticisms of the AI industry? If so, why do you think that is?

Not at all, I can just identify dishonest arguments.

Why do you ask questions with obvious ulterior motives though?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com