I wonder how much my post would come across as AI-written. I wrote almost all of it by hand.
Of course, I do use AI for technical reinforcement, but I wonder how this kind of principle would come across.
"HN, detecting 200 of the last 10 AI written articles"
Tools like Panagram will simply fall into uselessness as more people read AI and write like AI. Language converges. Much like people started saying "that's cool" to mean something is neat rather than cold, "If not X then Y" will become a pattern humans use far more commonly because they read it in AI all the time.
If the slop really starts to take off on theTok, and teen girls start to say, "You're completely right, we're not just focused on the load bearing substrate, we're delving the seams of our relationship", I'll start to worry.
This is a very weird take to me and honestly may be more of your (and my) bubble thinking than ground reality.
https://www.nms.org/blog/helping-students-and-teachers-use-a...
>Student AI use is already widespread — the question isn't "if" but "how." A 2025 College Board study found that 84% of high school students reported using generative AI for schoolwork, commonly for brainstorming, editing essays, and research.
https://dailynexus.com/2026-03-05/seeing-and-believing-how-a...
>But this was over a year ago, and as the percentage of AI-generated content on social media rapidly grows, my own ability to identify generated content has begun to falter. 71% of social media content was AI generated as of March 2025, with a forecasted increase to 90% throughout this year.
Simply put, AI generated media isn't just the "you're completely right" stuff, there is a whole lot more going on here.