That's a tautology though. You're defining a set of people by their illegal behaviour and then saying "all of these people have a demonstrated comfort with a capacity for ignoring the law". Well, yes, obviously.

My point earlier was that people don't neatly sort themselves into "law-abiding citizens" and "felons" until after they've committed a crime. A law-abiding citizen can turn into a felon at any moment.

And, of course, this is in the context of the gun control debate, where you can't issue guns to only law-abiding citizens because you have no clue which of those law-abiding citizens are going to commit a felony and magically become a felon