> Rocks don't talk to me and think and act intelligently.
These are not required for consciousness.
> Current LLM's do.
Computer chat bots are not a new thing. So were all the past ones conscious too?
These are not required for consciousness.
> Current LLM's do.
Computer chat bots are not a new thing. So were all the past ones conscious too?
Define consciousness right here, otherwise we have nothing else to discuss. You keep making up undefined crap and circular "it is it, because it is it" nonsense without proof. If you cannot immediately and clearly define consciousness in a testable clear manner right now, I will ignore and stop all conversation with you until you do.
Potentially past models could have been. None before came close to being this articulate and able to think and talk on our level before, and do things beyond us like difficult math problems.
So consciousness does not require externally observable behavior. That was my point. So a rock could be conscious for all we know..
Also, If you are irritated by my "crap", why don't you stop replying? Are you paid or somehow obliged to correct every crap talker on the internet or something?
I said no such thing..lol...If you are hanging to this, it is a waste of my time to talk to you.
But at least, I gave my definition of consciousness, and at least there is one person who can test for it (oneself).