There is no evidence to substantiate what you are saying.
Every possible proof exists already as a possible generation in the grammar of lean or rocq. In no way does that mean we have discovered everything.
Every possible proof exists already as a possible generation in the grammar of lean or rocq. In no way does that mean we have discovered everything.
The map is not the territory, etc. If math was just an elaborate linguistic Glass Bead Game then we wouldn't be funding it. The intuition is that the surface rules of math help uncover the underlying structure of reality.
While every formal proof can be encoded mathematically that doesn't imply that the grammar of lean or rocq is sufficient to encode every potential proof.
However the core of what you are saying: that every possible proof exists in the space of all mathematical statements is correct.