Balanced, sure. Why is 50/50 ethically coherent?
P.S: I hope this wasn’t too political of a comment. I know we want to keep HN political free. But it does need to be said there’s a difference between policy differences and desecration. Example from today: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/18/trump-white-house-ban-msnow-...
Both of our political parties have done highly unethical things.
Without getting into a bunch of hot-button political fights, I'll just say: Different people prioritize different issues and the parties (and their politicians) each have a lot to be ashamed of.
No, but one party does have a disputable claim on being ethical. The other party doesn't even have a disputable claim any more.
Even if the government is unethical, it's still a good idea to push for good policy (unless you're an accelerationist).
Obviously we're talking about businesses here so what they are pushing for is probably ethically neutral in itself. But supporting everyone equally seems like the least bad option.