Hacker News Reader

Comment by shock | Hacker News Reader

I see you've edited your comment to remove the part about the vibecoded website being disrespectful towards humans. As a human I find these types of comments about the vibecoded websites, when the submission is not about the website, disrespectful.

Do you have anything to say about OpenJev, which is not about the website?

View on HN

Yes. These jev-copy projects are all vibecoded, and only mimic the shape of output. Typesafe's documentation is excellent and provides developers with guidance on what exactly to expect from their model. It's also clear that typesafe developed a generalist model that they've tested to work across domains and use cases.

Using libraries like this provide none of those assurances. Sure, you can improve performance with fine tuning , but then we're going back to doing what a model like jev was created to eliminate.

> These jev-copy projects are all vibecoded

Since you've looked at all of them, why do you think https://huggingface.co/convaiinnovations/laya is vibecoded?

This is a link to a fine tuned modernbert model. Like I said, a bert model can produce jev shaped objects but they're too small to generalize.

I asked about it being vibecoded since you claimed that all jev-like projects are vibecoded. You responded to something I didn't ask.

https://github.com/NandhaKishorM/laya/commits/main/

Is this clear? The model has a waitlist and isn't publicly available. How can you claim it's proficient at general tasks?

Touche. I'm using it and find their claims credible but they deserve broader scrutiny.

It's generally available on OpenRouter now: https://openrouter.ai/~typesafe/jev-latest

Reply on news.ycombinator.com