> It's as if someone talked about investing in the US, and someone felt obliged to blog about the differences between Illinois and New York and rural Idaho, Mississippi, Alabama and South Dakota.
This, exactly, seems to be the point OP is missing.
This, exactly, seems to be the point OP is missing.
Scale
You'd be surprised.
Rural Idaho and New York have very little in common in buying preferences, business opportunities, employment opportunities, cost of living, potential market and such.
And New York and parts of Mississippi or South Dakota have even less. Would you base an startup on Holly Ridge or Indianola?
Heck, there are parts of South Dakota (the Indian reservations) that have a life expectancy of 48 years -- a third world like number.