>But precisely how does it accelerate if its instrument in the real world to do harm isn't already trained in the domain of doing so?

i am having a really hard time parsing what this sentence means, sorry.

>There was a tweet about someone going to visit a doomer Meetup

yes, any reasonable person immediately recognizes this is very silly, and probably shouldnt be used as a representative example of what normal people are saying.

>So if your starting axiom is that AI is going to kill us all in 10 year

its not. my point is that you keep saying ai isn't "needed" to wreak havoc. most people agree with that. but the rate at which havoc can be wrought is increased with ai. this is extremely evident already.