Firstoff: "looked at the content that flowed through it" – if you tried, you would have seen that you cannot do that (without downloading illegal stuff yourself, which would be illegal if you’re not law enforcement with the task to do that, so I sure hope you didn’t).
And no one ever got prosecuted for the encrypted chunks of stuff they cannot decrypt on their disk. So this part is just fearmongering.
And to quote 2023: ”Freenet / Hyphanet shows up on hacker news and the top comment is advocating against running it because “we don't need privacy against the police“.” – “in the year after many states in the US outlawed abortion and police used period trackers to find women who might try to get an abortion”.
And the Russian poet who shares his poems on Hyphanet so they survive when police knocks at his door definitely does need this protection.
In contrast, the pedo-criminals around Epstein communicated via email.
And looking at the recent pedo-bustings, those communicated via WhatsApp, Skype, Game platforms, Music sites, and HD streaming, and they traded horrible material in volumes that exceed the current maximum storage in Hyphanet by orders of magnitude, and had 100x the members of the total user count of Hyphanet. Some info:
https://www.infoportal-rg.de/2025/04/03/news-kinderporno-rin...
So the relentless fight within Hyphanet to not be a platform for pedo-criminals seems to work. It has moderation systems without centralized power but with sensible defaults.