Hacker News Reader

I certainly dont care about hiding LLM contributions and all crazy anti-LLM policies, but I really hope author can share process completely so this can be reproduced by someone not working for Apple.

View on HN

> crazy anti-LLM policies

Weird how justified reasonable policies get the "crazy" label.

Asahi state as one of its goals upstreaming Apple Silicon support into Linux Kernel and kernel does not have similar anti-llm policies.

Imagine what happen if OP submit patches upstream skipping Asahi and they gonna be accepted.

Imagine how crazy it is to be throwing shade at someone for having ethics and holding themselves to a higher than required standard.

Apple offer LLMs, so they are already on board with the LLM arguments.

I have many frustrations with LLMs, mainly around the type of user whos brain shuts down, but Apple would be walking a very fine line if they offer a service that they also will sue you for using.

Perhaps they should have used the Foundation Models to build their code. Really put Apple in a difficult position.

Anti LLM is not justified, it's crazy. They are digging their own grave.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com