Hacker News Reader

Because otherwise it would be an act of war. At which point they might as well have just fired a rocket into the country.

finish the thought: this means you need to retaliate. You either step up and hit back, or look weak and invite further problems.

random vandals -- that's just local scumbags being scumbags. These things happens, no need to start WWIII

> You either step up and hit back, or look weak and invite further problems.

The latter is exactly what the western world did in 2014, and its why we have this much larger war now.

So we should attack russia, cause WW3 because you are paranoid that they might do that first?

We should forcibly remove russian occupying forces from Ukraine.

That would be enforcing international law, not pushing for war.

Are we also going to invade USA to make them stop attacking iran, venezuela and so on?

That would probably need to come from domestic public pressure.

Different countries work differently. What would work for russia would not necessarily work for the USA.

So, the typical one sided approach to morality the western has?

What are you talking about?