If you think I'm joking, check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-Rqv9dOB1U
I don't think any of us are ready for the wave of sloppy shit that's going to hit us soon.
The only thing I can say about LLMs is that we might end up with some broad, stable utility from them, when the dust settles. The only thing crypto is really good for is hiding the source of impermissible donations.
Absolutely incredible trolling from some of those people I’m sure, while others are actual believers
Eric Morrison is doing the gods' work.
Of course you'd feel no need to justify all the exceptions when people you don't like are excited about a movie, food item or video game. Yuur justification for cynicism is vacuous, which will obscure realistic concerns.
"No ability to think for myself", ok bud.
"Broad categories I don't like" - found the crypto bro. If by those categories you mean spammy low effort people with no knowledge, ethics or desire to add something valuable to the world then yes - I don't like that category of people.
"Yuur justification for cynicism is vacuous, which will obscure realistic concerns" - Your poor grammar is obscuring your actual meaning. "Yuur"?
Hey enjoy the incoming flood of 100x the email spam, phone/sms spam, AD spam, everything spam, shit non-products, etc. Yeah that sounds like a great time, don't mind this cynical guy here who just "dislikes some kinds of people".
> they'll raze the ground to ashes before anyone can use it for legitimate means.
You were so cynical you thought this one category of people would literally prevent any fruitful use. Now you simply argue with me whether the category exists at all.
> I really have no idea what you're on about. There's TONS of examples of people abusing this already.
Grossly dishonest in spirit, you are.
I hope such a day never arrives.
This. Not only this but it has expanded this pool of people. Now you don't just have to be malicious, you can just be lazy and excited about not having to lift a finger, and/or you could just be dumb and excited about doing things you were never able to before.
Competent, well meaning people need not apply. Grifters, sloths and bozos will do just fine.
Our hiring pipeline was 100% full of AI cheaters recently - like 6 in a row that we interviewed (broken process too). Not exactly the same, but close enough and just shows how many people would be willing to waste a bit of time in an AI driven fraud versus doing actual productive work. I don't see the get-rich-quick folks as being any more scrutable, but it does certainly scale more and have a bigger blast radius of damage.
Not so much reducing cost by reducing headcount, but reducing liability; it's the legal labyrinth which is the barrier to entry to scale business. While it is present elsewhere, it's universal in employment.
The real question is "how big can a business be before it requires a legal department?" That an AI can automate many rote tasks and have some expertise means the benefits of scale with less of the risk.
I've seen: designers, performance marketers, data scientists, SEO experts, product managers, engineering managers, CRM expert, all using it for pretty much every single individual part of their job. I don't have to even mention programmers, of course.
Once in a while the most egregious ones get caught. I've seen so far a product manager, three data scientists, a CRM person and several developers getting fired for doing absolutely nothing but showing up, firing Claude with a few integrations to a dozen tools and prompting "do the work".
Might sound harsh, but after the last few years, I really don't see why an LLM wouldn't do a better job by itself compared to 80% of employees of tech companies, honestly.
Every time we see another AI agent "gone rogue", every time we see more LLM slop turning up by e-mail, comments, blog articles, people did that. Not AI -- people feel like they can get away with it. People are setting the machines out to do these things. We should be addressing the people, not the machines. The machines are the symptom.
Every time people manage to get away with something, it's insane, it's addictive. It's all over once you get caught, but until then, maybe forever, LLMs can feel like a cheat code...
These people were fired because their work was considered shit by their managers and produced no results. They were replaced by nobody. They were dead weight pretending to work.
EDIT: I think this sounds quite similar to tales of developers and Excel wizards automating their jobs in secret and producing the same results. This was not the case here, as the results were considered low quality.
One can argue semantics and fairness all day long, but if an employee is adding no value to their $90 Claude signature, then they’re gonna get fired as soon as someone realizes. :/
Pray tell, what will these fantastical vibe coded business sell, and why will anyone pay for it?
This is a fundamentally political question. When different customers demand different new features, and other customers demand particular bug fixes, who do you satisfy first? The one with a small but growing account, or the old account who has been with you from the beginning? I would challenge anybody who thinks agents mean you can just do everything, immediately - by all means, prove me wrong and build Google again overnight.
And how is growth financed? Reinvestment, equity, debt? I would challenge anybody who thinks this can be reduced to a calculation, because money ultimately flows between humans; even if somebody grants an agent access to a current account (and some are, experimenting with vibe day-trading), a human always retains final control and can liquidate that account whenever they like.