Hacker News Reader

Comment by cogman10 | Hacker News Reader

Oh that's a really good way to handle it that would actually follow the intent of the program.

You can't find someone to do a job? Then you need to compete on wage with other companies to bring someone in. Or, you know, raise your salary for local employees.

View on HN

A simple stack rank and cut has the problem of where to draw the line.

Also, how to value pre-ipo stock

There are other good options as well (an auction, etc). They all have problems, but there are mitigations. It could be vastly improved even if it’s not perfect.

It’s just the will to do it.

Another problem: different industries and roles natohace different pay ranges.

If you decide on a single pay cutoff software engineers will starve everyone else out. And there are of course great, well paid people in other hard to hire industries.

Maybe that's ok? It would raise pay in other industries.

I doubt it. Most are limited by the economics. They just don’t make as much per employee as software.

Something about those industries would change. They might charge their customers more or train up more people or get more creative with technology. Or the market might decide it can do without that additional productivity from those companies.

But at the moment there are quotas right? So it's basically the same - there are N visas to give out so you rank by salary and pick the top N.

the salary weighted lottery today is a good step in the right direction IMO.

I think it has to be by industry and role. Software, mechanical engineering, teaching, medicine, etc are all very different

It needs to compensate for country and position.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com