I'm not entirely sure what the argument was here

seemed to be stay in school, work for a big company, save some money, and get to know as many people as you can, and you'll be better perpared to start a company after all that (say at 30) than you would be without all that (say at 20)

I mean I guess thats true

I didn't see a real convincing argument that that education would be any better than the education you'd get from starting your company at 20, and going through some fires

seems like at 30, that guy will be better educated for starting a company than our first guy

I don't see any real great argument for school and big companies providing for exclusive learning opportunities