Also, is The Times admitting they were in possession of the illegal pictures? Does Freedom of the Press protect against that?
Also, is The Times admitting they were in possession of the illegal pictures? Does Freedom of the Press protect against that?
> The Times conducted its own scan for child sexual abuse material on X by writing an automated computer program that searched for related terms without displaying the images, which are illegal to view. Links to the images were sent to a Microsoft service that checked whether they were included on lists of known abusive material compiled by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and other child safety groups. Matches were verified by analysts at the Canadian Center for Child Protection.
Thank you for copy-and-pasting how they did it.
Are you suggesting the national database maintainers are in possession of illegal pictures and should also have their rights questioned?