Hacker News Reader

This used to be a pretty standard discussion a few years back when people still were being hired. I never saw any better way to systematically and somewhat fairly test a large number of candidates, so would you kindly elaborate on that statement?

View on HN

This always reads like an admission - “Well of course it’s bad, but how else am I supposed to interview at mass scale?”

Why would you test a large number of candidates in the first place?

In a way it is this admission. Interviewing is a very difficult process to get right.

> Why would you test a large number of candidates in the first place?

How else do you do it for a company of the size of Google or Amazon?

See https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2015/03/06/the-hiring-post/ for some ideas.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com