This may sound ignorant but it looks like ERSC intends to situate itself as a middle ground between tools that are supported by more general purpose protocols (i.e., Tangled and apparently, eventually, Forgejo) and tools that trying to maintain the whole shebang (like Radicle).
The exception here being that ERSC also apparently intends to be less dependent on git than the others too.
If true, they have the clear advantage.
Sort of! It's not that we're against general purpose protocols, it's just that they need to be fit for purpose. For folks for whom the git protocol works for them, we're happy to support it. We just need more than that.
And yeah, we're not dependent on git-the-codebase at all.
Did you know that rivers contribute a significant portion to our atmosphere's moisture?
I found this reply very confusing... is this an atproto joke?