Whatever side you come down on, privacy doesn't stand a chance against a small amount of convenience.
Whatever side you come down on, privacy doesn't stand a chance against a small amount of convenience.
‘Listening’ sort of implies intelligence is paying attention to what is said. It’s more ‘hearing’ than ‘listening’
There are documents on how these activation words work
- The microphone always vibrates from the sound waves
- The microphone is powered in a way that the sound waves change electrical readings in some way
- The electrical readings are sent to another component reading them
- A component receiving the data does some kind of unbuffered processing related to triggered actions (e.g. a clapper or a activation wave)
- Some component temporarily uses a buffer of the data but not for permanent storage (e.g. live, unstored transcription for the deaf or a 'nevermind' after a triggered activation)
- Some component stores or sends data generated by the sound, but not necessarily the original audio or even any attributions of who (e.g. voice trigger web search sends the search query as text)
- Some component generates a stored copy of the transcription with attribution of who
- Some component stores the actual audio in a way that can be later replayed
I'd say this "sounds" like a mess to deal with, but then I'd be worried about falling into a category ;).
What the smart speakers and devices do with the keyword is closer to the clapper than an actual transcription.