How do you manage your frustration in these interactions? I often find myself getting pissed off
Surely you still have to give feedback to Claude. How do you do that without talking to Claude directly? By using a different model? But wouldn't that AI have no more common sense than Claude?
Initial dev required talking to Claude. Now I add a ticket in the board, it makes me a mockup/writeup, I approve, and it gets me a temporary webserver, iOS/Android build, etc. to verify it.
Review loops, agents that enforce my pet peeves and testing/debugging processes, etc. all run automatically... and then Codex strips down the prose at the end. There's not zero AI generated output, but it's already been critiqued and verified by a whole cluster of independent actors before it gets to me. When I have feedback, I file a ticket.
I wanted to get out of the "what the fuck, why?!" loop. Now I let the agents handle that.
They talk to each other, come to consensus, and give me a structured thing to look at that has already been vetted and tested and screenshot evidence and a verification plan. It’s not conversational for me.
Do you run into this problem? If not, then I need to figure out how to stop running into it myself.
If so, then how do you give it all the incremental corrective feedback without a conversation?
20-30 agents probably touch an average ticket, but I sign off about twice.
In my experience, Claude Code is great at making a first-pass at a project, but once you start asking it to make changes, it explodes. A bug fix that should only be 2 lines turns into adding 3 functions totaling 100 lines.
Something as simple as "make the button blue" should be done manually.