But that lead happened to be the same approach Levent and Tristan had found...
Meaning they would have found it first if OpenAI hadn't spent millions in compute on following their lead to its conclusion faster than them.
Meaning they would have found it first if OpenAI hadn't spent millions in compute on following their lead to its conclusion faster than them.
To be clear, I only talked about the mentioning of the approach to solving it and not of the proof in the training data.
They did check and it was in the trainingset but they could not confirm if it was the /cause/ of it, which is a bit of a cop out.
Do you have a source, especially of what was in the training data specifically?
As I mentioned, they would have to find out whether the mentioning of the approach is only present in Tristan Buckmaster's chats and not in other users', including free users', chats.