Sebastian did not deny those claims. He affirmed them, and apologized.
It’s true that Tristan has no concrete evidence OAI accessed their session. It’s impossible for him to have that without OAI’s say so.
Why are you framing things so pro OAI?
It’s true that Tristan has no concrete evidence OAI accessed their session. It’s impossible for him to have that without OAI’s say so.
Why are you framing things so pro OAI?
- He insisted that OpenAI initiated research based solely on rumors and never accessed their Codex sessions.
- He mistakenly believed Tristan and Levent were solving the same problem in Anthropic.
- proposed two option. (1) Tristan becoming the lead author to revise OpenAI’s work, or (2) OpenAI providing internal model to support and bridge their research.
- Sebastien insisted there was no intention to alter authorship. He was simply uncomfortable sharing OpenAI’s work,model with an Anthropic researcher. Additionally, He believed Levent’s credit seemed limited as their work focused on Euler.
- complained that negotiations with Tristan and Levent were difficult
[1] https://xcancel.com/SebastienBubeck/status/20973794116915163...