The average user doesn't make principled decisions around what hardware they use, the software they buy or the services they use. We have billions of Chinese phones and Windows laptops as proof of that. You can give them decades to make a healthier choice, and they'll still go back to use Meta properties if it gives them what they want.
HN users are a tiny minority of social media users, and I think it's easy to buy the fallacy that our privacy-obsessed outlook is the norm. But much like YouTube or X, there will be people defending these dumpster fires until their final breath because it's what they want. We can't stop them any more than I can make you quit using HN.
Nothing wrong with either of these. Your snobbery is showing.
By the way, normies have a negative impression of Microsoft, and also use their stuff.
> HN users are a tiny minority of social media users
I am not at all talking about HN users. I am not in an HN bubble. Maybe you are, and you are projecting this onto me.
They've had a negative impression of Microsoft for three decades. Windows is still the dominant desktop OS.
Hence my original question; how much time does a name change buy you? Windows didn't need one, even though it's bloated spyware.
I think you need to recalibrate what a "normie" is.
Do you like your utility company? Your phone company? Your ISP? Your insurance?
Meta products are entertainment, not water and power, comparing them to that is so overblown.
Plenty of people don't use IG or Facebook at all, and plenty of people just go on every now and then and enjoy the experience and leave.
> Roughly 54% to 70% of Americans express an unfavorable view of him
> Zuckerberg is viewed negatively by both major parties. Democrats and Republicans alike report high rates of disapproval regarding his influence and leadership.
> Dislike for the Meta CEO spans all age groups, though younger adults display particularly high skepticism.
YOU GUYS are so far out of touch to say normies don't hate and distrust the people behind Meta. They will use the products but this is not a positive reflection on the brand at all.
Clearly that isn't true.
Now you're hyper focusing on how people feel about FB, and not whether it precludes them from being the target market. Convenient.
And before you respond saying "I never said they aren't the target market, just that they hate FB". To which I say, reread the damn conversation. You're obviously drawing a relation between hating FB and not being the target market. Even if you're now scrambling to back out of that claim because we've shown you 3 billion reasons why you're wrong.
All I said to enter this thread was:
> I don't think normies have a positive association with meta.
And a bunch of you guys contested this for some reason.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/11/02/most-am...
Which was my point: CEO affinity =/= the affinity for the product people use
And "Meta" is not the product people use.
Instagram is at 19% disliked. Majority "like" instagram. https://yougov.com/en-gb/topics/application/Instagram-Mobile...
BMW is at 14% disliked. Just as another "not everyones cup of tea" brand comparison. https://yougov.com/en-gb/topics/brand/BMW
I just don't think people (normies) care. You can dislike a CEO but that doesn't mean you dislike the product or use it less.