Hacker News Reader

OAI could check whether those accounts enabled training data. If "yes", OAI could trace whether that data was used in any related training process. If either of those answers comes out to be "no", then that's sufficient to conclude training data independence.

We wouldn't need a full ablated re-training and solution attempt, contra tedsanders in a sibling comment.

View on HN

> could trace whether that data was used

The point of de-identifying data is to ensure you can't trace who it came from. It would be a serious privacy violation if they could.

If the model includes unique data from a person then that person can identify the data - the allegedly plagiarised material - and so re-identify it. There doesn't need to be a privacy breach to close that loop as it requires the person to identify the information is associated with them first.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com