Hacker News Reader

This is unconstitutional (fourth amendment) parallel construction. Combined with a corporate surveillance state panopticon, this is "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime."

I think the problem is the parallel construction and lack of warrant

Who gets to review financial transactions (without a search warrant) and determine them as suspicious and actionable? Every time your bank flags a transaction, a police officer shows up at your door?

Seems like there's no way to administer this warrantless surveillance without violating the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

And unconstitutional!