I'm almost instinctively opposed to software that claims that it can "fact check".
Fair .... it shows the sources so you can check yourself, and if you'd rather not, it still gives you the basic rundown so you're not starting from nothing
where does it pull its sources from? Should I expect some degree of exhaustiveness? Meaning: does it miss information?
Does it ever prioritize one source over another? Will somebody ever see a source from, say, a Joe Rogan podcast? What makes a source reliable?