Yes, quite a bit actually. It's directly analogous to e.g. "Red sky at night, sailors' delight", i.e. a pseudo-scientific approach that probably has a better-than-random success rate.
So it’s a heuristic. Lots of very valuable heuristics exist.
None of which is authoritative, per my initial comment.
And I'd agree if that's what GP said.
What name do you use for an approach that probably gets a better than random success rate (without guaranteeing that)?
I’m leaving out the ‘pseudo-scientific’ part of GP’s description, since it doesn’t entail anything technically.
I was talking about the root comment that just said "it's AI because this website said so", not the one about treating it like a heuristic. I agree with that.