> The real problem with AI is that the productivity benefits are focused with the owners and not the workers.
What makes you think so? What evidence do we have one way or another?
What makes you think so? What evidence do we have one way or another?
Btw, if you are looking for a villain, look at the land share of GDP. The capital share has been fairly steady.
As far as I can tell so far, the benefits from AI seem to flow mostly into customer surplus, not towards owners and investors. There's just so much competition between AI providers for anyone but customers to capture the benefits.
Pick your favourite years when you think the economy was going great for workers, and look at some archived newspapers (or even just the headlines).