I'm not absolutely opposed to AI in principle. If it writes things worth reading, I'm not opposed to reading them.

The problem is when it writes things that have the appearance of making sense but actually don't, when it writes what could be better put in 10% of the words, when it writes with no coherent logic. I don't have the time or the mental energy to wade through that on the faint chance that there might be a gem in there somewhere. But I have the same objection to human writers who do the same things.

Write something worth reading. I don't have time for it otherwise.