Hacker News Reader

Comment by LatticeAnimal | Hacker News Reader

Unserious comment: The big company will spin up swarms of agents whose job is to overwhelm your AI agents with legal requests / correspondence, still with the goal of making you run out of money (but now via AI spend).

View on HN

Plot twist they'll be running Claude Bible or GPT-Galaxy with max reasoning on, against my dumb local Qwen-0.8b and they'll run out of money before I do.

Currently their attorneys cost much more than yours. That doesn't appear to be sufficient.

First: it's a joke.

Second: the US justice system is also a joke. I could fight Google in justice and win in my country (France) and in pretty much any other developed country because a working system doesn't let big actor DoS smaller player out of justice. You obviously can't fix a corrupt syatem with technology.

Perhaps Brandolini’s Law might apply here.

> The big company will spin up swarms of agents whose job is to overwhelm your AI agents […]

This may be a plot point in a William Gibson novel.

but clearly there is diminishing returns on spend here right? Assuming that tokens will get cheap enough then once we both spend 10,000$ no one's is getting more advantage because both LLMs exhaust all effective paths hitting high rates of diminishing returns making further attack investments mostly void.

The legal process isn’t a free for all. There’s only so much bullshit they can throw at you before the judge finds them in contempt.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com