Hacker News Reader

EULA != license, which is the entire point.

Licenses are contracts, just like an EULA.

And if you expand the acronym EULA you will actually find that it is… a license agreement.

Yes, and the point is that in order to obtain and keep the license, you have to fulfill additional clauses that you agreed to by accepting the EULA.

If EULA is the same as a license, why would MSFT not just use a license? The intellectual contortions of the AI boosters here are stunning.

"an end-user license agreement is the same as a license agreement, so why do they use an end-user license agreement instead of a license agreement?"

I don't understand this question.

No one but, you, an AI moron, has asked this question. Get your AI girlfriend to explain it to you.

And the AI swine reacted by downvoting the top comment again now that arguments for an EULA are made. Fucking fascists.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com