I’m not convinced by the automatic agent-to-agent thing. I find that, if I manually ask a standard harness “Review a..b, individually and for combined effect”, I get some mix of catching genuine errors (some quite deep), incorrect flags where the correct course of action is to ignore them or modify the commit messages, and comments where the correct course of action is to think deeply.

If I were to automate the back and forth, I would get spurious changes that “fix” what wasn’t broken and a removal of the actual interesting bits.