Calling Steve Jobs ‘Lucky’ Would Be A Sin
statspotting.com
statspotting.com
Lived in California during the dawn of the personal computing age.
Met Woz.
These 3 coincidences put him ahead of billions of other people. And they are coincidences. They're luck.
Luck matters; we just don't like to admit it -- http://chester.id.au/2012/03/02/does-leadership-matter/
Yes, all these things happened by some fortunate cosmic happenstance. But that is true for everything. Take away a few key pieces from a flow in history, and the flow might not have taken place at all.
The point is that, statistically, such fortunate confluences happen all the time. Only a few produce a flow that blazes a trail. And it does have a lot to do with the characteristics of the people who find themselves at the cusp of it.
Could someone else have been as successful as Steve had these early things happened to them? Maybe, maybe not.
Could someone else have been as successful as Steve had some other set of fortunate events come together? Maybe, maybe not.
It is silly to take away from a person, and attribute it all to luck.
And where, exactly, did I do that?
And you can met Woz, but you would still have failed creating a company. And properly failed miserably.
Steve Lived at the dawn of the personal computing age, and got kicked butt by IBM, M$ and Intel. Wow. Lucky
He got kicked out of his own founding company. Extremely Lucky.
There are properly some luck involved in every successful billionaires, Bill Gate for exmaple. But Steve, I would put him as the last one on the list.
So Yes. It is a Sin.
So yeah. Luck.
The guy had a head on his shoulders, you've got to give him that.