It's also easier to understand. For the internet to be fault tolerant you have to get rid of CDNs and assume everyone needs the same thing. That's more expensive than a centralized "internet" which relies on CDNs and fiber paths exclusive to the regions with most demand. Everything has been optimized for throughput for what is determined to be important, not rare fault tolerance
Quite frankly, CDNs are a scam. I will not elaborate because I don't feel like doing free labor for the folks who don't already understand this to their core.
One could say the same thing about any cloud hosting.
So you don't know, if you did you would elaborate, it's not hard to type, hardly it can be counted as work
Why Reticulum when we have IP?
We need IPv6 desperately for fault tolerance
Read the Zen of Reticulum and you'll understand the point.
That sounds rather tautological. If you can't even articulate the virtues in your own words
I don't want to rehash the content of the Zen of Reticulum which explains the concept rather well, which is ironic because you're claiming tautology, when to rehash the content of the Zen of Reticulum would, itself, be tautological. What's the problem here?