Current generation tactile sensors cost a couple thousand $ PER FINGER, and have a real world MTBF of hours. The cost can be solved with economy of scale. The fragility is harder.
Current generation tactile sensors cost a couple thousand $ PER FINGER, and have a real world MTBF of hours. The cost can be solved with economy of scale. The fragility is harder.
>> It will be difficult to match this scale of breadth and depth of data for physical tasks. There’s no straightforward equivalent of “just Efficient learning, generalization, and adaptability / on-the-job learning seem like requirements.
Isn’t this the idea of NVIDIA’s Isaac? Model based adaptive learning in virtual environments for robotic systems? Or is this oversold?
Are we talking about experimental laboratory ones here? What happens when the Alibaba players start getting into the game? They have plenty of humanoid robots.
That's why the human operator needs a gun. :-)
Just imagine yourself controlling an imperfect robot with some joysticks or maybe a sensor suit. You'd certainly do much better than current robots. The limit is the robot's brain, not the physical actuators/sensors.