I don't want to read LLM written text (EDIT: just replying to parent comment, not implying at all that the tutorial might be written that way; it definitely does not look like it). It would be nice if people could just disclose when they used LLMs for their writing and how, then people who care can skip and people who don't can read. Of course this would have to come with not shaming the people who disclose actual use of LLM, otherwise we're back to square one.

Is it worth a human reading it or not? There are many, insipid human-writers (me included). Historically I got a lot of value of reading info posted on HN.

I hope we don’t, or that if we do it’s because either it has become impossible to hide or everyone became honest about it.

Tons of conversations are fatiguing, such as climate change, the rise of totalitarianism, the erosion of rights, mass surveillance… These conversations will only cease when we fix the problems or give up on trying to fix them.

I feel your pain, I too am fatigued at these. But I’d rather criticise the ones causing the problem than the ones pointing it out.