I imagine an LLM with no safeguards and a psychopathic mind would be considerably more dangerous than a gun. I don’t mean only for hacking. Though everyone in the world suddenly having a pocket expert hacker should be taken seriously.
I find it completely insane when people bash the labs for even considering safety. The entitlement is off the charts.
I am taking it extremely seriously. That is why I want my own AI models running on my own computers defending it at all times.
Define the axis along which "more dangerous" is measured?
If we are scoring on lethality, guns already score 100%, instantaneous death. If we are scoring on number of casualties, guns have already been used to cause mass-fatalities.
Unless we are giving the LLM an armed drone, skynet-style, we're at best talking about indirect casualties (swatting, hacking street lights to provoke crashes, etc).
Im not suggesting its a good idea, but its only a matter of time before someone decides its better than being invaded/attacted by another country thats doing the same
That is much more dangerous than a man with a gun.