> is support being dropped because the previous filesystem had strong encryption?
This statement seems to imply that APFS encryption is less secure than HFS+ encryption and no further evidence is given.
This statement seems to imply that APFS encryption is less secure than HFS+ encryption and no further evidence is given.
Was the VeraCrypt/Wireguard situation simply a "paperwork" issue? Even if it is, doesn't that mean the bar is now crazy difficult for any other open source developers to get encrypted filesystem or new VPN drivers into Windows?