https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/29/openai-cfo-sarah-friar-tells...
OP is way overinterpreting something we don't even have verbatim in a way that unfortunately resembles what they're rightly accusing Zitron of.
The source you linked says: "Friar told staffers that annualized recurring revenue in July was higher than in the second quarter as a whole."
If we're charitable that means they annualized the quarter, i.e. multiplied by 4.
Which, if both measures are ARR, just means that a single month outperformed the average of three months, which is something that happens 50% of the time. Something you can opportunistically say whenever the coin flips the right way.
The less charitable reading is even worse, that one month's revenue times 12 is more than three months worth of revenue. Because duh.
Neither of these makes any sense.
“In an internal meeting with employees on Wednesday, finance chief Sarah Friar and board chair Bret Taylor touted OpenAI’s revenue growth and addressed competition with Anthropic, CNBC has learned.”
But the figures she is comparing are the revenue proper, not the growth per month.