Praearcturus gigas: giant scorpion from Lower Devonian (Lochkovian) of Britain
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
> Originally described as an isopod in the nineteenth century, and subsequently compared to various arthropod groups, it was re-described with limited illustration as a gigantic scorpion in the 1980s.
“We reopened Pandora’s box”
> Illustrating P. gigas with camera lucida drawings, light photography and tomographic data,
No why would you do this
> and assign several other specimens from the same formation to this taxon,
Nooo
> Several characters supporting a scorpion affinity are present in P. gigas, including large pedipalps with a fixed and movable finger, a stridulatory surface on one of the coxae, and an elongate subtriangular sternum morphology … Uniquely among scorpions, P. gigas has lateral epimera on the mesosomal tergites,
I don’t know what any of that means but it all sounds absolutely horrible
> and combined with the fluvial environment in which the fossils are preserved, we suggest that P. gigas may have been aquatic or amphibious.
OH GOD IT’S UNDER THE WATER
I WILL NEVER GO WILD SWIMMING AGAIN
And in the article the cherry on the cake: it was OR IS from Herefordshire. Where I will shortly be moving.
Sideways outerparts on the midbody backparts, I see, I see.
It was about 1 meter long (as another commenter pointed out) and lived around 400 million years ago.
I wonder how it manages to find the middle ground in controversial topics. My own extreme views have become somewhat moderated thanks to reading AI-LLM opinions and reasonings on the topics.
Would welcome correction but it does seem to inevitably lead to a sea of slop if GAI is trained on GAI output, particularly areas like this where there is little data and no training.