That is... not remotely true, nor supported by either of the links you shared. (Nor by any cursory look at the state of the world today, with well-anticipated Himalayan glacial floods as front-page news.) You therefore appear to be leaping over the line from healthy skepticism to irrational conspiratorial thinking, so I'm going to stop engaging, sorry.
Disengaging is sticking your fingers in your ears and blurting out “la la la la I can’t hear you!”
And calling that a win.
The problem isn’t science, the problem is that there are adults with the maturity of a four year old acting as sciences hype man.
https://www.theweek.in/news/world/2026/08/28/new-satellite-i...
The two links I give show the problem in action. In 2013 the IPCC was concerned because temperatures had gone sideways for a decade. Der Spiegel's first sentence is "Data shows global temperatures aren't rising the way climate scientists have predicted" and the next says they were trying to "hush it up". In 2015 climatologists announced a new temperature record that replaced the entire 21st century with different data, as reported by Nature.
That's an unambiguous sequence of events. You can't make statements about replicability in an environment where they routinely decide their already published data is wrong post-hoc, without retracting the papers built on that data.
Because Down Votes Are Truth.
And that, ladies n gennelman, is How Science Works.
That’s how we end up with Jason Arday: Up Votes.