Per the post, the original authors have requested that the original paper be retracted. That’s well above the bar of “not doing much”.
"Finally, it should be noted that when we shared these posts with Ariely and Wertenbroch a few weeks ago, they reached out to Psychological Science to request that the article be retracted. As of this writing, that process is ongoing."
Look for:
> Klaus Wertenbroch […] indicated that he has asked the editor to retract the paper.
How did he agree to be a co-author when "he never had access to the data for any of the studies"?