What was the point to you? What I took away from the article is that AI adds a bunch of complexity that is making it harder, not easier to understand.

And I'm saying that is true, but it's also enabling a kind of complexity and ambition in outcomes that might be a worthwhile trade-off.

In the same way we accept that cars are no longer something that a mechanic can understand and repair without a laptop, because we trade off the repairability and understanding for better mileage or safer handling.

Either I misunderstood the article, or people are misunderstanding my point, because I'm genuinely confused by being called a bot.