It feels so intimidating. There's so much stuff going on. Maybe it is good for agents who can just motor through that volume, but me personally, I would want something simpler, maybe an `OpenClaw-lite`
Which is why it's so big with the PM/PO-turned-vibe-coder crowd.
Not everything is security critical.
Like "Ohh you got a bunch of CRM addresses of people who go to a small time dog grooming company. You ready to sell that on the dark web?"
Just to be clear, I’m not advocating that people that benefit from openclaw move to coding agents. This isn’t a “dropbox is just SFTP” comment, more that if you are already using coding agents, it feels like they do most of what I saw from openclaw at least a few months ago.
Am I missing something? Would love to be proven wrong.
Would not recommend running this, it's the antithesis of the Linux philosophy.
I built an agent to work with local Ollama models, and it will keep working and iterate on a goal until finished, but it doesn't do sub-agents or or any of the "just burn a million tokens but finish this" pipelines that seem to be the trend now.
It's a simple D executable that basically consumes no resources in your local machine.