> much worse at producing artifacts that are comprehensible to humans
This has always been the case. Just try making sense of the output of any assembler/compiler/transpiler. Why do we think differently about generated source code?
This has always been the case. Just try making sense of the output of any assembler/compiler/transpiler. Why do we think differently about generated source code?
* it's like a compiler => you can trust it
* it's a revolution like the spinning jenny => what came before is fast becoming an obsolete hobby
It's not just that these metaphors are bad, they are absurd if you think about then for just a few seconds.