Hacker News Reader

The problem is you can't prove if AI was used or not so Debian's response is actually the most logical one. If anyone uses AI they're still responsible for what they submit.

What happens when the AI submitted code has been submitted by AI, Who's then responsible?

Whoever controls the AI, as per the article we're discussing.

Debian isn't a free-for-all, they don't accept fly-by-night contributions, there needs to be a real and serious person behind every contribution.

Folk get's lazy, it'll will only be a matter of time. Ai controlling Ai, deep fakes are deep fakes.

Not being able to always prove that something wasn't done isn't a good argument no to make it clear that doing something you find unacceptable is in fact not acceptable.

OpenBSD seems to have this stance.

Source: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=177425035627562&w=2

Might be time for me to give it a serious go

Gentoo, Guix, a few others

I will take a guess and say every systemd-less one