Wht do you mean by some surely it is all who think he is non English,
The Angles – ancestors of the English were the people whom he was fighting against.
Now was Arthur Roman or Celtic or Welsh etc is up to debate.
The Angles – ancestors of the English were the people whom he was fighting against.
Now was Arthur Roman or Celtic or Welsh etc is up to debate.
The more typical question would be "is Arthur based on any historical events at all?"
Most of the Arthur "myth" is deliberately constructed fiction by specific authors, rather than folk myths.
But the further back you go, the less historical they become. And I don't mean in the sense of historical records being less reliable farther back in time; I mean that the characters in the oldest legends are clearly supernatural figures. There is no reason to postulate supernatural figures as having historical enemies. Why would they?
This makes zero sense.