> Not sure what to make of this.
Not much as the sample has (literally) survival bias.
Not much as the sample has (literally) survival bias.
I'm sure you can find more such subsets. The problem with the Epstein subset is that 100% of his friends survived (Lutnick's brother mentioned above wasn't one) and that Epstein was far from a normal person who had already been involved in Iran Contra and Angola CIA affairs. How to take that into account statistically?
It isn't just a matter of being statistically illiterate.
How do we know this? Not disputing this, I am just curious what evidence we have that ensures none of the dead were friends with him?